Table 1: Table 1-Current Initial Base Assessment Rates Risk Category (Pg 10672)

Table 2: Table 2-Initial and Total Base Assessment Rates (Pg 10673)

Chart 1: Effective Assessment Rates, 1950-2010 (Pg 10675)

Chart 2: Reserve Ratios, 1950-2010 (Pg 10676)

Table 3: Table 3-Initial and Total Base Assessment Rates (Pg 10683)

Table 4: Table 4-Initial and Total Base Assessment Rates [Once the reserve ratio reaches 1.15 percent and the reserve ratio for the immediately prior assessment period Is less than 2 percent] (Pg 10685)

Table 5: Table 5-Initial and Total Base Assessments Rates [If the reserve ratio for prior assessment period is equal to or greater than 2 percent and less than 2.5 percent] (Pg 10686)

Table 6: Table 6-Initital and Total Base Assessment Rates [If the reserve ratio for the prior assessment period is equal to or greater than 2.5 percent] (Pg 10686)

Chart 3: Various Measures' Ability to Predict Current Expert Judgment Risk Ranking (Pg 10689)

Table 7: Table 7-Scorecard for Large Institutions (Pg 10690)

Table 8: Table 8-Weights for CAMELS Component Ratings (Pg 10690)

Table 9: Table 9-Cutoff Values and Weights for Measures to Calculate Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress Score (Pg 10691)

Table 10: Table 10-Calculation of Bank A's Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress Score (Pg 10691)

Table 11: Table 11-Cutoff Values and Weights to Calculate Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress Score (Pg 10693)

Table 12: Table 12-Calculation of Bank A's Score for Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress (Pg 10693)

Table 13: Table 13-Performance Score for Bank A (Pg 10694)

Table 14: Table 14-Cutoff Value to Calculate Loss Severity Score (Pg 10694)

Table 15: Table 15-Loss Severity Score for Bank A (Pg 10694)

Table 16: Table 16-Scorecard for Highly Complex Institutions (Pg 10695)

Table 17: Table 18-Cutoff Values and Weights for Measures to Calculate Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress Score (Pg 10696-10697)

Table 18: Table 19-Cutoff Values and Weights to Calculate Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress Measures (Pg 10697)

Chart 4: Initial Base Assessment Rates (Pg 10699)

Table 19: (Pg 10709)

Table 20: Scorecard for Large Institutions (Pg 10710)

Table 21: Cutoff Values and Weights for Measures to Calculate Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress Score (Pg 10710-10711)

Table 22: Cutoff Values and Weights to Calculate Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress Measures (Pg 10711)

Table 23: Cutoff Values to Calculate Loss Severity Score (Pg 10711)

Table 24: Scorecard for Highly Complex Institutions (Pg 10712)

Table 25: Cutoff Values and Weights for Measures to Calculate Ability to Withstand Asset-Related Stress Score (Pg 10713)

Table 26: Cutoff Values and Weights to Calculate Ability to Withstand Funding-Related Stress Measures (Pg 10713)

Table 27: Cutoff Values for Loss Severity Measure (Pg 10714)

Table 28: Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule Before the Reserve Ratio of the DIF Reaches 1.15 Percent (Pg 10717)

Table 29: Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule (After Adjustments) Before the Reserve Ratio of the DIF Reaches 1.15 Percent (Pg 10717)

Table 30: Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule Once the Reserve Ratio of the DIF Reaches 1.15 Percent and the Reserve Ratio for the Immediately Prior Assessment Period is Less Than 2 Percent (Pg 10718)

Table 31: Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule (After Adjustments) Once the Reserve Ratio of the DIF Reaches 1.15 Percent and the Reserve Ratio for the Immediately Prior Assessment Period is Less Than 2 Percent (Pg 10718)

Table 32: Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule If Reserve Ratio for Prior Assessment Period is Equal to or Greater Than 2 Percent But Less Than 2.5 Percent (Pg 10718)

Table 33: Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule (After Adjustments) If Reserve Ratio for Prior Assessment Period is Equal to or Greater Than 2 Percent But Less Than 2.5 Percent (Pg 10719)

Table 34: Initial Base Assessment Rate Schedule If Reserve Ratio for Prior Assessment Period is Equal to or Greater Than 2 Percent But Less Than 2.5 Percent (Pg 10719)

Table 35: Total Base Assessment Rate Schedule (After Adjustments) If Reserve Ratio for Prior Assessment Period is Greater Than or Equal to 2.5 Percent (Pg 10719-10720)

Table 36: (Pg 10720-10722)

Table 37: Table C.1-90th Percentile Annual Loss Rates for 1990-2009 Period and Corresponding Risk Weights (Pg 10724)

Table 38: Table D.1-Runoff Rate Assumptions (Pg 10724)

Table 39: Table D.2-Asset Loss Rate Assumptions (Pg 10725)

Table 40: Table 1.1-Change in Assessments as a Percent of Income (Pg 10726)

Table 41: Table 1.2-Change Assessments as a Percent of Losses (Pg 10727)

Table 42: Table 2.1-Descriptive Statistics for Risk Measures (Pg 10728)

Table 43: Table 2.2-Descriptive Statistics for Risk Measure Scores (Pg 10728)

Table 44: Table 2.3-OLS Regression Results: Scorecard Measures (Pg 10729)

Table 45: Table 2.4-Derivation of Scorecard Weights (Pg 10729)

Table 46: Table 2.5-Logistic Regression Results (Pg 10730)

Table 47: Table 2.6-OLS Regression Results: Weighted Average CAMELS (Pg 10730)

Table 48: Table 2.7-OLS Regression Results: Measures in Current Small Bank Method Dependent Variable=Expert Judgment Ranking as of Year-end 2009 (Pg 10731)

Chart 5: Chart 3.1-Percentage of Large Bank Failures Predicted by Total Score as of Year-end 2006 (Pg 10732)

Chart 6: Chart 3.2-Estimated Large Bank Failure Probabilities Based on Total Score of Year-end 2006 (Pg 10733)