1
Statement by FDIC Chairman Jelena McWilliams
on the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Revisions to the Community Reinvestment Act
Regulations
FDIC Board Meeting
December 12, 2019
The business of banking has changed dramatically in recent years, and regulations must evolve
with the industry in order to foster an effective system that serves the needs of businesses and
consumers across the nation. By modernizing our regulations implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA), we expect to promote greater investments in the communities that
need them most.
Generally, when we speak of different statutes and regulations, those discussions can appear
technical in nature, often complex and nuanced, and, at times, somewhat removed from an
ordinary person.
CRA is not one of those statutes.
In fact, CRA, unlike so many other statutes, touches the lives of ordinary Americans in a direct
way that is somewhat unique in our bank regulatory framework. When a law or regulation
becomes out of sync with the technological and business changes, the beneficial impact of such
laws or regulations can diminish.
The impact of CRA regulations becoming out of sync with technology that banks utilize to offer
banking services is all the more compounded for the communities the law is intended to serve.
At its core, the CRA encourages banks to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which
they are chartered, including low- and moderate-income (LMI) areas. This statutory objective
remains as critical today as it was over 40 years ago. However, in light of the transformative
changes in the banking industry during this period – including the advent of digital banking – it
is clear that the regulations implementing the law must be updated if they are to fulfill this
objective.
Today, the Board considers a notice of proposed rulemaking that would modernize the
regulations implementing the CRA, the last major revisions to which were made in 1995. The
proposal will preserve the aspects of the regulations that are working well while updating
outdated components and providing much needed clarity to financial institutions, resulting in an
improved framework that will benefit LMI communities across the nation.
The principal goal in undertaking these reforms is to increase LMI lending. Our proposal seeks
to achieve that goal in several ways, including:
Statement by FDIC Chairman Jelena McWilliams
on the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Revisions to the Community Reinvestment Act
Regulations
FDIC Board Meeting
December 12, 2019
The business of banking has changed dramatically in recent years, and regulations must evolve
with the industry in order to foster an effective system that serves the needs of businesses and
consumers across the nation. By modernizing our regulations implementing the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA), we expect to promote greater investments in the communities that
need them most.
Generally, when we speak of different statutes and regulations, those discussions can appear
technical in nature, often complex and nuanced, and, at times, somewhat removed from an
ordinary person.
CRA is not one of those statutes.
In fact, CRA, unlike so many other statutes, touches the lives of ordinary Americans in a direct
way that is somewhat unique in our bank regulatory framework. When a law or regulation
becomes out of sync with the technological and business changes, the beneficial impact of such
laws or regulations can diminish.
The impact of CRA regulations becoming out of sync with technology that banks utilize to offer
banking services is all the more compounded for the communities the law is intended to serve.
At its core, the CRA encourages banks to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which
they are chartered, including low- and moderate-income (LMI) areas. This statutory objective
remains as critical today as it was over 40 years ago. However, in light of the transformative
changes in the banking industry during this period – including the advent of digital banking – it
is clear that the regulations implementing the law must be updated if they are to fulfill this
objective.
Today, the Board considers a notice of proposed rulemaking that would modernize the
regulations implementing the CRA, the last major revisions to which were made in 1995. The
proposal will preserve the aspects of the regulations that are working well while updating
outdated components and providing much needed clarity to financial institutions, resulting in an
improved framework that will benefit LMI communities across the nation.
The principal goal in undertaking these reforms is to increase LMI lending. Our proposal seeks
to achieve that goal in several ways, including:
2
• Encouraging banks to make long-term commitments in LMI communities by providing
greater credit for retail loans retained on-balance sheet;
• Increasing to $2 million the size of qualifying loans to small businesses and small farms
to encourage economic development and job creation and help family farms;
• Providing CRA credit for retail and community development activities in Indian
Country; and
• Expanding the activities that qualify for CRA credit to include capital investments and
loan participations undertaken by a bank in cooperation with Community Development
Financial Institutions (CDFIs), regardless of where the CDFI is located.
In addition, the proposal would clarify the activities that qualify for CRA credit in two key ways.
First, it would require the FDIC and OCC to publish periodically a list of illustrative examples of
qualifying activities, and establish a process for stakeholders to seek agency determination of a
qualifying activity. Second, it would establish new performance standards to assess: (1) the
distribution of qualifying retail loan originations to LMI individuals, and to small farms and
small businesses in an assessment area; and (2) the quantified value of the bank’s qualifying
activities relative to its assessment area and bank-level retail deposits. Both components would
be compared to specific benchmarks and thresholds that would be established prior to the
beginning of a bank’s evaluation period. We believe these steps will incentivize great CRA
activity by enabling banks to plan activities without the risk of such activities not qualifying for
CRA credit, which they cannot do with specificity under the current framework.
The proposal would also recognize the evolution of the banking system – including the
emergence of digital banks – by requiring banks to add assessment areas where they have
significant concentrations of retail domestic deposits. This proposal, which recognizes that
banks may now receive large portions of their deposits from outside their traditional assessment
areas, conforms with the CRA’s intent to ensure that banks help meet credit needs where they
collect deposits, which they cannot do with specificity under the current framework.
The proposal would leave intact existing provisions for banks to delineate assessment areas
where they have their main office, branches, and deposit-taking facilities, and to include in those
areas the surrounding geographies where banks originate or purchase a substantial portion of
their loans.
Finally, the proposal would ensure that small banks are not overly burdened by the need to
overhaul their existing systems or collect and report extensive data to comply with the new
framework. Accordingly, the proposal would allow small banks (i.e., those with $500 million or
less in total assets) to select to be evaluated under the current rules or to opt in to the new
performance standards.
***
I would like to close by emphasizing the need for robust public comment on this proposal. As
with any comprehensive set of reforms, we rely on stakeholder feedback to help us make further
improvements. We will continue to engage with banks, community groups, Congressional
• Encouraging banks to make long-term commitments in LMI communities by providing
greater credit for retail loans retained on-balance sheet;
• Increasing to $2 million the size of qualifying loans to small businesses and small farms
to encourage economic development and job creation and help family farms;
• Providing CRA credit for retail and community development activities in Indian
Country; and
• Expanding the activities that qualify for CRA credit to include capital investments and
loan participations undertaken by a bank in cooperation with Community Development
Financial Institutions (CDFIs), regardless of where the CDFI is located.
In addition, the proposal would clarify the activities that qualify for CRA credit in two key ways.
First, it would require the FDIC and OCC to publish periodically a list of illustrative examples of
qualifying activities, and establish a process for stakeholders to seek agency determination of a
qualifying activity. Second, it would establish new performance standards to assess: (1) the
distribution of qualifying retail loan originations to LMI individuals, and to small farms and
small businesses in an assessment area; and (2) the quantified value of the bank’s qualifying
activities relative to its assessment area and bank-level retail deposits. Both components would
be compared to specific benchmarks and thresholds that would be established prior to the
beginning of a bank’s evaluation period. We believe these steps will incentivize great CRA
activity by enabling banks to plan activities without the risk of such activities not qualifying for
CRA credit, which they cannot do with specificity under the current framework.
The proposal would also recognize the evolution of the banking system – including the
emergence of digital banks – by requiring banks to add assessment areas where they have
significant concentrations of retail domestic deposits. This proposal, which recognizes that
banks may now receive large portions of their deposits from outside their traditional assessment
areas, conforms with the CRA’s intent to ensure that banks help meet credit needs where they
collect deposits, which they cannot do with specificity under the current framework.
The proposal would leave intact existing provisions for banks to delineate assessment areas
where they have their main office, branches, and deposit-taking facilities, and to include in those
areas the surrounding geographies where banks originate or purchase a substantial portion of
their loans.
Finally, the proposal would ensure that small banks are not overly burdened by the need to
overhaul their existing systems or collect and report extensive data to comply with the new
framework. Accordingly, the proposal would allow small banks (i.e., those with $500 million or
less in total assets) to select to be evaluated under the current rules or to opt in to the new
performance standards.
***
I would like to close by emphasizing the need for robust public comment on this proposal. As
with any comprehensive set of reforms, we rely on stakeholder feedback to help us make further
improvements. We will continue to engage with banks, community groups, Congressional