Statement of FDIC Vice Chairman Hoenig
on the Semi-Annual Update of the Global Capital Index
April 25, 2018
The Global Capital Index (GCI), released today by FDIC Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig, shows the largest
U.S. banks reporting higher capital ratios at year-end 2017. The U.S. G-SIBs’ average IFRS tangible
leverage ratio estimate — a measure of tangible equity funding a bank’s assets — increased to 6.92
percent, up from 6.62 percent in June 2017. However, these results reflect two important events that
occurred during 2017 that affected the different leverage ratios for the largest banks reported in the
GCI.
First was the adoption by the largest banks of the clearinghouses’ settle-to-market (STM) rule change for
certain centrally cleared derivatives transactions that treats the exchange of variation margin as a
settlement rather than collateral.1 The accounting impact of this rule change results in the
derecognition of gross balances of the netted derivative assets, liabilities and associated collateral
disclosed in a firm’s financial statements. This is estimated to have reduced the reported off-balance
sheet derivative exposure by approximately $845 billion for the U.S. G-SIBs from year-end 2016 to year-
end 2017.2 Without this change, their IFRS tangible leverage ratio estimate drops 44 basis points to 6.48
percent. Second, the largest U.S. GSIBs distributed 125 percent of earnings to shareholders through
dividends and share buybacks for the full year 2017. 3
“The STM rule change allows banks to derecognize these assets and liabilities in their financial
statements allowing capital to appear greater relative to assets when including off balance sheet risk,
when no real increase in capital has occurred,” Vice Chairman Hoenig said. “The implications can
eventually become profound especially as these banks ramp up capital distributions, as we saw in 2008
when the true capital position of the largest banks became painfully revealed”.
Although the adoption of STM represents a significant easing in capital requirements, U.S. G-SIBs
continue to benefit from their better capitalized and financially stronger position than their counterparts
across the globe. U.S. G-SIBs continue to trade at a premium of 1.41 to book value, while their European
and Canadian counterparts trade at a median discount to book of 0.89 and Asian counterparts are
trading at 0.67.
###
The Global Capital Index can be found at https://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/board/hoenig/global.html
1 Statement of FDIC Vice Chairman Hoenig on the Capital Treatment of Derivatives and Variation Margin
- https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/speeches/spaug1417.html
2 STM treats the exchange of variation margin as a settlement instead of collateral and resets the value
of those derivatives to zero. Financial statements generally footnote the gross balances. Adding this
exposure back results in the much lower IFRS estimated tangible leverage ratio and a more accurate
reflection of the reliance on debt.
3 Capital Distribution Tracker - https://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/board/hoenig/capitaldisttracker.pdf
on the Semi-Annual Update of the Global Capital Index
April 25, 2018
The Global Capital Index (GCI), released today by FDIC Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig, shows the largest
U.S. banks reporting higher capital ratios at year-end 2017. The U.S. G-SIBs’ average IFRS tangible
leverage ratio estimate — a measure of tangible equity funding a bank’s assets — increased to 6.92
percent, up from 6.62 percent in June 2017. However, these results reflect two important events that
occurred during 2017 that affected the different leverage ratios for the largest banks reported in the
GCI.
First was the adoption by the largest banks of the clearinghouses’ settle-to-market (STM) rule change for
certain centrally cleared derivatives transactions that treats the exchange of variation margin as a
settlement rather than collateral.1 The accounting impact of this rule change results in the
derecognition of gross balances of the netted derivative assets, liabilities and associated collateral
disclosed in a firm’s financial statements. This is estimated to have reduced the reported off-balance
sheet derivative exposure by approximately $845 billion for the U.S. G-SIBs from year-end 2016 to year-
end 2017.2 Without this change, their IFRS tangible leverage ratio estimate drops 44 basis points to 6.48
percent. Second, the largest U.S. GSIBs distributed 125 percent of earnings to shareholders through
dividends and share buybacks for the full year 2017. 3
“The STM rule change allows banks to derecognize these assets and liabilities in their financial
statements allowing capital to appear greater relative to assets when including off balance sheet risk,
when no real increase in capital has occurred,” Vice Chairman Hoenig said. “The implications can
eventually become profound especially as these banks ramp up capital distributions, as we saw in 2008
when the true capital position of the largest banks became painfully revealed”.
Although the adoption of STM represents a significant easing in capital requirements, U.S. G-SIBs
continue to benefit from their better capitalized and financially stronger position than their counterparts
across the globe. U.S. G-SIBs continue to trade at a premium of 1.41 to book value, while their European
and Canadian counterparts trade at a median discount to book of 0.89 and Asian counterparts are
trading at 0.67.
###
The Global Capital Index can be found at https://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/board/hoenig/global.html
1 Statement of FDIC Vice Chairman Hoenig on the Capital Treatment of Derivatives and Variation Margin
- https://www.fdic.gov/news/news/speeches/spaug1417.html
2 STM treats the exchange of variation margin as a settlement instead of collateral and resets the value
of those derivatives to zero. Financial statements generally footnote the gross balances. Adding this
exposure back results in the much lower IFRS estimated tangible leverage ratio and a more accurate
reflection of the reliance on debt.
3 Capital Distribution Tracker - https://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/board/hoenig/capitaldisttracker.pdf
The Global Capital Index relies on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to measure a firm's
tangible equity (loss-absorbing capital) against a more complete reporting of derivative exposures, as
shown in Column 7 of the table. The largest financial institutions continue to reference their risk
weighted capital ratios (Column 3) rather than their tangible equity capital ratios (Column 8) to suggest
they are well capitalized. However, this higher number occurs because assumed risk weighted assets
represent only 51 percent of total assets measured under IFRS. The net effect is to reduce assets used in
computing the risk based ratio, thus overstating the true equity capital available to absorb losses relative
to the total risk of on- and off-balance-sheet exposures.
tangible equity (loss-absorbing capital) against a more complete reporting of derivative exposures, as
shown in Column 7 of the table. The largest financial institutions continue to reference their risk
weighted capital ratios (Column 3) rather than their tangible equity capital ratios (Column 8) to suggest
they are well capitalized. However, this higher number occurs because assumed risk weighted assets
represent only 51 percent of total assets measured under IFRS. The net effect is to reduce assets used in
computing the risk based ratio, thus overstating the true equity capital available to absorb losses relative
to the total risk of on- and off-balance-sheet exposures.